Catching Pedophiles $Pedos
41
PumpScore 41/100 Grade D
Catching Pedophiles earns a 41/100 PumpScore (Grade D). Launched 2 hours ago on Pump.fun, Pedos pairs $- of liquidity with $59.5K of 24h trading - thin depth for a token this young.
How Pedos scores
Breaking it down, Pedos scores highest on trade participation (100/100) and lowest on liquidity depth (0/100) - the area to watch.
Liquidity depth0
Liquidity vs market cap0
24h trading volume90
Healthy turnover55
Buy / sell balance95
Trade participation100
Survival time9
Market-cap tier21
Price stability94
Volume vs liquidity0
Price
$0.00000219
Market Cap
$2.2K
24h Volume
$59.5K
Liquidity
$-
24h Change
-77.88%
24h Buys / Sells
960 / 715
Tip Low on trading activity? Many Solana creators use a Pump.fun trending bot to build steady volume and chase King of the Hill.
About Catching Pedophiles
I'm the biggest pred catching streamer and I'm going to take my talents over to Pumpfun. I will be going live on PF and catching predators and calling police on them.
Contract
8JzGK8Q7bNWHRnqNGpz1zvi38zrMXuz9WucSHXRSpump
Questions about Catching Pedophiles
What is the Pedos price?
Catching Pedophiles is priced at $0.00000219 (-77.88% in 24h), giving it a $2.2K market cap on $- of on-chain liquidity as of Jul 12, 2026 10:00.
Why does Catching Pedophiles score 41?
The main driver of the Pedos score is trade participation (100/100); the main drag is liquidity depth (0/100). Each signal is weighted and combined into the 41/100 total.
How is Pedos rated on PumpScore?
As of Jul 12, 2026 10:00, Pedos scores 41 out of 100 on PumpScore (Grade D). The score weighs thin liquidity, active volume and balanced trading into one number.
How much liquidity does Catching Pedophiles have?
Pedos shows $- in its pool (thin depth). Deeper liquidity relative to the $2.2K market cap generally means steadier prices and lower rug risk.
Can I trust Catching Pedophiles?
No score can prove Pedos is safe. Catching Pedophiles carries thin liquidity and a 41/100 structure read, but brand-new tokens can fail regardless. Treat this as data, not advice.
